1993 H. No.2412 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Mr. M Bethel QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Queen's Bench Division B E T W E E N MARGARET ISHOBEL HODKIN - Plaintiff and - JONATHAN CAVEN-ATACK - Defendant UPON hearing Counsels for the Plaintiff and for the Defendant AND UPON the hearing of an appeal by the Defendant against the decision of Master Tennant given on the 26th day of April 1995 upon the hearing of the Plaintiff's Summons dated 14th March 1995, ordering that: 1 The Defendant's defence be struck out and the costs of the action be taxed and paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, the Defendant having failed to swear and serve one affidavit or affirmation completely of itself complying with the Order of 27th June 1984, and 2. that the costs of and occasioned by this application be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff in any event. IT IS ORDERED that: 1 Appeal dismissed. 2. Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs of this appeal on an indemnity basis, such costs to be taxed and paid forthwith. 3. Judgment for the Plaintiff for: (i) damages to be assessed; and (ii) an injunction restraining the Defendant by himself his servants or otherwise from further publishing or causing to be printed published and distributed the book entitled "A Piece of Blue Sky" containing the defamatory words set out in paragraph 3 of the Statement of Claim namely: "The head of the Scientology school in East Grinstead was being called as a witness. She denied that a twelve-year-old girl had received a 'withhold pulling session' at the hands of three of the school's staff. To 'pull withholds' is Scientologese for making someone confess to their transgressions. Minutes of the schools board meetings had to be publicly available, yet the filed copy made no reference to the 'withhold-pulling' session. I obtained an unedited copy of the school's board minutes, which not only proved the headmistress's sworn statement untrue, but showed the school's attempt at concealment." or any similar words defamatory of the Plaintiff. 4. Defendant refused leave to appeal. DATED this 18th day of May 1995
| Back to Related Documents page |