Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Subject: COPYRIGHT AND TRADE S
Message-ID: <9509171908.0QVXK01@support.com>
References: <43h96k$6op@panix2.panix.com>
Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150
X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35
Distribution: world
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 95 19:08:20 -0700
Lines: 35


Andrew Greenberg continues his critique of style:

>Believe me, you are too
>accomplished at your style to be seen to be a jerk by the discerning
>reader.  But to someone unwilling to read past your rants, henry, yes, the
>truth does go away.  If your remarks are to convince the church, of
>course, give up the ghost.  If your remarks are to convince the others,
>however, you need to rethink some tactics and style.  If your remarks are
>simply to beat up on me because you don't like me, well, to hell with you,
>too.
 
    Substantive arguments please.  We know you don't like our 
    style.

>Re-read your very posting to which I have replied.  Dead Agent tactics
>against Greenberg?  "Always attack"  You make my point for me more
>eloquently than can I at times.  Here, you already have.
          
    Since your points are about style instead of about substance,
    they are off topic in this newsgroup.  Discuss scientology, 
    why don't you?

    Because it would be obvious to everyone that you don't know
    what you're talking about if you did?

    <just guessing>

>Andy Greenberg

            +--------------------------------------+
           Rev. Dennis L Erlich  * * the inFormer * *
      dennis.l.erlich@support.com  +  inForm@primenet.com
                           "tar baby"