Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com Subject: "IT'S HARD TO WO Message-ID: <9601131813.0PLTM03@support.com> References: <199601132112.QAA00442@redbox.newhackcity.net> Organization: L.A. Valley College Public BBS (818)985-7150 X-Mailer: TBBS/PIMP v3.35 Distribution: world Date: Sat, 13 Jan 96 18:13:38 -0800 Lines: 80 smokesig@ix.netcom.com (Neal Hamel) Someone: >>So, how many BT's are there? Me: > Hundreds of thousands on each person. The rest are Copies. > Has anyone talked about Copies? Neal: >Oooh! Copies of BTs? I have never heard this wrinkle in >Hubbard's cartoon cosmology. Neal I got raided so the public could read NOTs just as David Mayo wrote it, and you didn't bother to study it? For shame. Droppings before swine, would you call it? >Please tell us about it. Well, this time. Since you asked nicely. But next time dig out NOTs Series 1 and re-read it. It's got a whole section on Copies. BT's obsessively copy. Things, each other, ideas, whatever. What you think may be a body thetan can actually be a projected copy of a body thetan. Who's projecting the copy? Why, another body thetan, of course. It's his "picture" that you see and think it's a real BT when it's only a copy of a real bt. This is tek. Read it in NOTs 1 and 24. Is your head spinning yet? >One other thing while you are acting in the role of Mr. >'Answer Clam'. The Shell Answerclam. Geddit? Shell - clam? >In the discussion you are having with Keith >Cochran, you have responded about the time track. Hubbard >laid great importance on the 'date and locate' technique. Right, it's the primary way to blow BTs and clusters on lower level pc's that don't know they have 'em. (wait'll they find out!) >'date and locate' uses Teegeack time, i.e. seconds, hours, >days, years etc. pc's and pre-ots recall incidents long >before our stay on our lovely prison planet but they use >Teegeack time units. Yes, but it's years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds and fractions of seconds AGO. >How is it that we thetans were recording incidents on our >time track in Teegeack time before we ever got to Teegeack? You're confusing it with the dating drill 22 in the Book EM Drills. That's dating by date. >Was there a conversion program run on us when we got here? Yes. We were converted into being body thetans of Hubbard. >What is the deal on this? Stick with admin. You've got a future there. >-Neal "all ears" Hamel > >posted and mailed Same. Rev. Dennis L Erlich * * the inFormer * *